Uploaded image for project: 'Integration'
  1. Integration
  2. INT-1230

No Need for "ReadWriteMany" access on storage when deploying on Kubernetes

XMLWordPrintable

      Hello,

      today when deploying DMaaP with OOM, most of the PersistentVolumeClaim needs the "ReadWriteMany" (or "RWX") capability (except storage for postgresql):

       

      $ kubectl get pvc -n onap | grep robot
      onap-robot-robot                                                                 Bound     onap-robot-robot                                2Gi        RWX                                                        3h39m

       

       

      According to Kubernetes Documentation (https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/persistent-volumes/#access-modes), ReadWriteMany stands for "the volume can be mounted as read-write by many nodes".

      That means that a particular PVC needs to be read and written from many pods. That also means that your code takes that into account and do the work to avoid write at the same place at the same time.

      An issue on RWX mode is that most "official" storage driver from Kubernetes doesn't support it (13 over the 19 drivers doesn't support it, espacially OpenStack, Amazon and Google storage classes).

      It's then very hard in a lot of case to use Robot.

       

      If the needs is that the volume can be mounted as read by many nodes and write by one node (which seems to be the case), RWO (ReadWriteOnce) should be sufficient and is supported by all drivers.

       

      in the effort to deploy ONAP for gating on public cloud (one the priority of El Alto), using storage classes (and if possible RWO access) is very important.

            sdesbure sdesbure
            sdesbure sdesbure
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: