-
Epic
-
Resolution: Done
-
Medium
-
None
-
None
-
All Control Loop Policy Models should be TOSCA Compliant
-
2
In Dublin, not all the current policy models were converted to TOSCA compliant Policy Types. Notably the Control Loop operational and guard policies retained the pre-Dublin model definitions and simpler payloads for the new Policy Lifecycle API. The control loop projects successfully converted the DCAE uS Monitoring policies to the appropriate TOSCA Policy Types vs previously being declared as Node Types. CLAMP only had enough time/resources to support GUI changes for Monitoring TOSCA Policy Types.
Ideally, all the policies for Control Loops should be declared as TOSCA Compliant Policy Types. In addition, there should be a root Control Loop Policy Type for all the different types of policies such as and not limited to: monitoring, operational, guard, and control loop coordination. The root definition allows for better organization of the policies for a single control loop so a user and or application can "tie" the policies together. Ideally this can now allow the CLAMP platform to be developed such that it can dynamically support any potential Control Loop Policy Type defined by an ONAP user.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TOSCA+Compliant+Policy+Types
- blocks
-
REQ-33 Integration of CDS as an Actor in Control Loops
- Done
- clones
-
REQ-1 ONAP Requirement Template
- To Do
-
REQ-537 Long-term IPv4/IPv6 dual stack networking support
- Done
- is blocked by
-
CLAMP-492 CLAMP to support any policy type without additional coding
- Closed
-
INT-1350 Change vFirewall robot framework to update to new Operational Policy Type
- Closed
-
POLICY-2118 This epic covers the work to design and support TOSCA Compliant Policy Types for the operational and guard policy models.
- Closed
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...
-
Page Loading...