Uploaded image for project: 'Service Orchestrator'
  1. Service Orchestrator
  2. SO-322

Clean up Process Engine selection logic

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • Amsterdam Release
    • None
    • None

      Several failed attempts to split the BPMN application into multiple applications with separate camunda process engines have left a mess of confusing classes and process engine definitions.

      In the Amsterdam release, there should be only one BPMN application war.  This is MSOInfrastructureBPMN.  MSOCommonBPMN should not be deployed as a separate application.  Its classes are compiled into a jar and this is included inside MSOInfrastructureBPMN.

      The MSOInfrastructureBPMN application should use the "default" process engine.

      WorkflowAsyncInfrastructureResource and MSOCommonApplication classes are not needed.

            rd472p rd472p
            rd472p rd472p
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: