-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Medium
-
None
-
None
Several failed attempts to split the BPMN application into multiple applications with separate camunda process engines have left a mess of confusing classes and process engine definitions.
In the Amsterdam release, there should be only one BPMN application war. This is MSOInfrastructureBPMN. MSOCommonBPMN should not be deployed as a separate application. Its classes are compiled into a jar and this is included inside MSOInfrastructureBPMN.
The MSOInfrastructureBPMN application should use the "default" process engine.
WorkflowAsyncInfrastructureResource and MSOCommonApplication classes are not needed.