The format of required/excluded candidates list in HAS request built by OSDF is different than the one expected by HAS. The problem is decribed below:

OSDF request:

[

{     "identifierType": "vfmodule",     "identifiers": ["4d944b8f-557a-4fe7-bcb3-aec65927a065","e7227847-dea6-4374-abca-4561b070fe7d"] }

]

HAS Request build by OSDF:

[

{     "inventory_type": "vfmodule",     "candidate_id": ["4d944b8f-557a-4fe7-bcb3-aec65927a065","e7227847-dea6-4374-abca-4561b070fe7d"] }

]

Expected HAS request:

[

{     "inventory_type": "vfmodule",     "candidate_id": "4d944b8f-557a-4fe7-bcb3-aec65927a065" }

,

{     "inventory_type": "vfmodule",     "candidate_id": "e7227847-dea6-4374-abca-4561b070fe7d" }

]