-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
High
-
Casablanca Release
-
None
issues like port conflicts occur in VVP-128
currently 30298 is reserved for LOG - but is being used by vvp without a reservation
onap vvp-int-haproxy NodePort 10.43.12.68 <none> 80:30298/TCP,8080:30021/TCP,9000:30605/TCP
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/OOM+NodePort+List
for
onap vvp ClusterIP 10.43.228.193 <none> 8181/TCP 3d onap vvp-ci-uwsgi ClusterIP 10.43.212.158 <none> 8282/TCP 3d onap vvp-cms-uwsgi ClusterIP 10.43.37.200 <none> 80/TCP 3d onap vvp-em-uwsgi ClusterIP 10.43.59.232 <none> 80/TCP 3d onap vvp-ext-haproxy NodePort 10.43.130.24 <none> 80:30671/TCP,443:32054/TCP,22:30173/TCP,9000:31309/TCP 3d onap vvp-gitlab NodePort 10.43.37.206 <none> 80:31481/TCP,22:31975/TCP 3d onap vvp-imagescanner ClusterIP 10.43.173.176 <none> 80/TCP 3d onap vvp-int-haproxy NodePort 10.43.12.68 <none> 80:30298/TCP,8080:30021/TCP,9000:30605/TCP 3d onap vvp-jenkins NodePort 10.43.250.191 <none> 8080:32022/TCP 3d onap vvp-postgres ClusterIP 10.43.31.72 <none> 5432/TCP 3d onap vvp-redis ClusterIP 10.43.47.60 <none> 6379/TCP 3d
- blocks
-
VVP-128 VVP-EXT-HAPROXY node port is not fixed - was 30229 - then 30298 (taken from log - no more conflict)
- Closed
- is blocked by
-
OOM-1531 NodePort Adjustments
- Closed
- relates to
-
DCAEGEN2-1012 PNDA Nodeport 30288 conflict with sniro-emulator - should be 30400
- Closed